Posted 6:13 AM by Creditwrench

Here is an example of what a person can find online. This database supposedly keeps everyone's driver's license's on file. You enter your name and then you have the option to click "please remove." It will still be available to law enforcement, it just won't appear to the public. You must try it and see if yours is there. Its shocking with national security what it is and all.. and this is free and has no TOU agreement???!!



Driver's License Search



Incredible and unsettling...

Posted 1:45 PM by Creditwrench

I'm in deep shock over this. These people were among the dearest friends I ever had.

Farewell to Jack and Connie Somers-Wilder and their son Daniel, two daughters Lisle and Amy.

Jack was a constant attendee to our J-accuse meetings in the early days but after a couple of years he had a brain hemmorage and had to have brain surgery. It was pretty much downhill for him for quite a long time and the family wondered if he would survive but he did even though he lost a lot of his memory. That was why he didn't show up at meetings of late but he did attend Pat Patton's funeral last year.

Now this!!!!!

And just to think that at the time the fire was in progress I was actually thinking about going to visit them since it had been a while since I had seen them.

Read the full story here.

The funeral for the family will be held on Friday Morning at 10 A.M.

Posted 1:58 PM by Creditwrench

N.J. Appellate court: Let citizens seek grand jury probe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Coburn noted that a federal law allows citizens to ask federal grand juries for permission to appear and make complaints."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, June 30, 2004
BY ROBERT SCHWANEBERG
Star-Ledger Staff
Breathing new life into a long-forgotten right, a state appeals court ruled yesterday that ordinary citizens who have evidence of criminal wrongdoing can bring their suspicions to a county grand jury and request an investigation.

If it stands, the ruling would end the monopoly that county prosecutors hold on bringing allegations to a grand jury and create a new opportunity for concerned citizens to attack official corruption.

But the Attorney General's Office vowed to appeal, warning that the ruling invites unprecedented troublemaking by vindictive ex-spouses, political opponents and others with a grudge.

"It is a ludicrous decision," said John Hagerty, a spokesman for the state Division of Criminal Justice. "It allows for any citizen or gadfly to walk into a grand jury and try to indict a neighbor. It allows for public officials, during an election, to walk in and endeavor to indict an opponent."

Late yesterday, the Attorney General's Office asked the appeals court to stay its ruling until the New Jersey Supreme Court decides whether to hear the case.

The ruling was a victory for Larry Loigman, an activist lawyer who tried to present allegations of official wrongdoing to the Monmouth County grand jury. A judge told him to take his evidence to the county prosecutor and Loigman, a vocal critic of that office, appealed.

In a unanimous decision, three appeals court judges directed that a letter containing Loigman's allegations be read to the grand jury, which would then decide whether to launch an investigation and call Loigman as a witness.

"It is an excellent ruling for the citizens of the state," Loigman said. "Anyone who's dissatisfied with what's going on, they don't have to rely on the county prosecutor or the attorney general. They have their own representatives sitting there -- the grand jurors -- and now they have a way to approach those people."

"It certainly opens up the door to a whole new area for going after official misconduct," Loigman said.

Actually, the ruling reopens a door that has been so little used in recent years that even judges and prosecutors had forgotten it was there.

Taking a long view of legal history, Appellate Division Judge Donald Coburn concluded that a citizen's right to present allegations to a grand jury is well established. The most recent example he could find of its use in New Jersey was 47 years ago, and one case, from Louisiana, went back to 1893.

But some other states have embraced the right more recently.

Coburn quoted at length from a 1981 ruling of the West Virginia Supreme Court allowing any citizen to present a complaint to the grand jury by applying to the judge in charge of it.

"If the grand jury is available only to the prosecuting attorney and all complaints must pass through him, the grand jury can justifiably be described as a prosecutorial tool," the West Virginia high court wrote.
"If the grand jury is to be a meaningful institution, its integrity must be maintained as an independent body, free from all outside interference and prosecutorial control or direction."

Quoting a 1977 decision by Minnesota's supreme court, Coburn wrote that allowing citizens to bring complaints directly to the grand jury "serves as a kind of 'safety valve' and has much to commend it."

In light of the grand jury's "extraordinary powers of investigation,"he rejected claims by the Attorney General's Office that citizens had no right to bring complaints to the grand jury. Appellate Division Judges Stephen Skillman and Harold Wells joined Coburn's opinion.

Loigman said the case began when a client advised him of financial irregularities in the Middletown Township payroll related to a state grant from an agency within the Attorney General's Office. He said he alerted that agency to the improprieties but "they never conducted an investigation."

In February 2002, Loigman put his allegations into a letter addressed to the Monmouth County grand jury at the county courthouse. When he got no reply, Loigman said, he contacted Assignment Judge Lawrence Lawson, who told him to contact the county prosecutor or attorney general. Instead, he appealed.

The appeals court directed Lawson to have Loigman's letter read to the grand jurors along with any instructions the judge deems appropriate. Coburn said that every letter addressed to a grand jury should be delivered to the assignment judge, who will then "determine whether he or she should instruct the jury on the matter."

Loigman said the ruling applies only to county grand juries as a state law requires the Attorney General's Office to present all cases to the state grand jury. Coburn noted that a federal law allows citizens to ask federal grand juries for permission to appear and make complaints.



Robert Schwaneberg covers legal issues. He can be reached at
rschwaneberg@starledger.com or (609) 989-0324.

Posted 9:13 PM by Creditwrench

We'll start off with a post made by a smart alec named chas420 on the collection industry forum. Here is what he wrote to me in a post on 06/21/04

---

Posts: 97
Joined: Mar 2004

Monday 06/21/04 8:34 AM

wrench i would love to see you or one of your students try to get your case dismissed when i have a signed credit card application as well as a charge off statement showing a balance and a last payment as well as being clearly in statute. how pray tell are you going to get out of that one? and how are you going to put me out of business for sueing you to get it

---

Then this evening I received the following email from one of my students.

---

Bill I was reading this thread and just had e-mail you about it. If this CHAS420 would like to see if one of your students could get a dismissal with the info he stated, please tell him it's already been done, in fact they had more info against me than this CHAS420 mentioned. They had a signed app., statements and a notarized affidavit from their keeper of records and I was still able to get it dismissed . So if you'd like to use this info, please do. Here's the court and docket number:
Commomwealth of Massachusetts, Worcester District Court, Docket #0262CV2639. Oh, one more thing. I now have a lawyer working on a good sized suit against this creditor and the CA they had come after me.
Your greatful student
Mike

---

Now that is the kind of emails I like to get.

Posted 3:08 AM by Creditwrench

I was treated to a very pleasant surprise this morning when I checked our Blog's statistics and found that the J-accuse Blog has been getting over 400 visitors per month.

I haven't really been paying as much attention to this blog as I apparently should have been but it is indeed difficult to come up with new material to post when working alone.

Some new and very interesting material is being worked on at the present time however and will soon be forthcoming.

Richard is headed for someplace south of Mexico this coming week for a seminar dealing with IRS. Since none of us will be able to attend I won't go into all the details of which I have precious few anyway.

It would be nice if some of our more prolific writers would jump in and send me some articles for posting to the blog to help keep up the interest and further the cause.

Bill Bauer

Posted 5:02 AM by Creditwrench

We are proud to once again be able to offer for your continued education Richard Cornforth. Richard will be conducting an educational seminar and workshop to explain the Secrets of the Legal Industry. He has been very successful in implementing these strategies for a number of years and has agreed to share this knowledge with those that wish to participate.

Richard Cornforth is known in this industry as one of the best. Richard is coming to Ohio to share his vast knowledge and information regarding the litigation process. Richard has authored a number of books such as The Secrets of The Legal Industry, Beating Up On Debt Collectors, and the most recent The Secrets of The Legal Industry 2004.

Richard has committed to a mission that is to expose the corruption of our legal system and why the slim ball attorneys and judges don’t want you to feel you have a chance to survive in the court system.

Some of the topics that will be covered in this seminar will include:

The Secrets of the legal system

Defense Strategies that work

About the IRS

Suing the IRS

Civil Defense against the IRS

These topics and many more will be covered in detail in this two day seminar. Richard has conducted extensive research in these and many more areas. These are not hypothetical theories regarding the process and what should work. You will be provided examples of successful documentation that has been used and won.

This workshop will provide the tools you need to be successful.

Richard Cornforth has revamped and restructured this Seminar using all new cases. Richard has a very impressive track record all around the country for assisting people to discover the secrets of the legal system that the courts do not want you to know.

JOIN US IN THIS EXCITING - INTERACTIVE WORKSHOP
Entire civilizations have been lost due to lack of knowledge. America is no exception. Countless numbers of innocent Americans continue to lose their rights and never regain the God Given Rights we are entitled due to the lack of knowledge.

It’s time we take back control of our lives and property.

DATES June 5th and 6th, 2004

From 9:00AM – 5:00 PM +

LOCATION- Ramada Inn (Airport)

4801 E. Broad St.
Columbus, OH, 43213 US
614-861-0321

Price of admission to this event will be:

$200.00 in advance

$225.00 at the door

This will include all study materials and Lunch for both days.

*In order to keep the cost of this seminar as low as possible, we should receive full payment by June 1st for those who wish to attend.

Please make your Reservations ASAP.

Seating is limited so reserve your seat as soon as possible.

Audio recording is permitted, video taping is prohibited

REGISTRATION FORM
THE OHIO LAW CLUB
Richard Cornforth June 5-6 2004

SPECIAL NOTICE: ANY AND ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED BELOW WILL BE HELD IN THE STRICTEST CONFIDENCE AND NOT SHARED OR SOLD.

Questions and Phone Registration:

Dean Gerhart

(740) 694-2767

Fax (517) 207-6896

Register online E-Mail:

Click here for the official Richard Cornforth seminar registration form

ADVERTISING BY MAGNA CARTA NEWS SERVICE

Posted 6:52 PM by Creditwrench

COMING SNAKE, LITTLE WEASEL & SPARRING WREN

Posted By: SecuredParty
Date: Tuesday, 10 December 2002, 3:10 p.m.

This is a re-posting of an article originally submitted by Richard McClendon
========================================================================

COMING SNAKE, LITTLE WEASEL & SPARRING WREN

Posted By: RICHARD MCCLENDON
Date: Friday, 28 June 2002, 12:22 a.m.
=======================================================================

This was sent to me by DanMeador

DanMeador@egroups.com
Due Process Work Group
dueprocess@onelist.com

From Dan:
Numerous people have requested Richard Cornforth's research on void judgments. To date, he hasn't posted anything comprehensive on the Net, and to the best of my knowledge, doesn't spend a great deal of time with Internet interchange. However, he has laid out plans for a book on the subject so it will possibly be available in the next several months.

In the meantime, Richard consented to write a short allegorical piece that conveys his interpretation of what the American people have been subjected to, and what he anticipates in the future.

Dan Meador

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

COMING SNAKE, LITTLE WEASEL & SPARRING WREN

An Allegory of Things to Come
Twin brothers, Coming Snake and Little Weasel, and their sister Sparring Wren, were the products of the union of their Native American Mother and their father, a trapper of European decent. Their father was the first European that their tribe had ever seen and were it not for the generosity of the tribe he would have starved as a scandalous outcast of his own trapper peers.

Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren were small when their mother died of a disease given to her by her European trapper spouse. The elders expelled the trapper rather than risk further disease victims within the tribe.

Although the tribe showed much generosity and nurturing, Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren grew to maturity with a well-deserved reputation for mischief and mayhem. Their acts were often mean and for many years, their sustenance was theft and pilferage. To make matters worse, Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren flaunted their evil practices as their birthright, claiming to be of a superior class engendered by their European father. When the tribal members could take no more, they petitioned the elders to expel them. Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren asserted that their presumed class made them immune from the elders' justice.

The elders had had enough though and rejected the idea of a superior or protected class, expelled Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren from the tribe. For many days they continued to straggle along behind the moving tribe, and being parasites, would pretend to be properly distant by light but at night would sneak into the tribe's camp to perpetrate their crimes.

One day Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren awoke quite late, even later than was their lazy custom. Shocked, they looked about to see that the tribe had left them to fend for themselves. For the first time in their lives they were stripped of the imaginary cloaks which they thought protected them. "Where are those who must serve us? Where are our subjects? We demand the attentions and tributes of our subjects!"

Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren spoke in succession but were answered by only the wind. For a while they walked but the heat of the sun made them very thirsty. Kneeling, Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren dug into the earth with their bare hands hoping to discover enough water beneath the soil to quench their awful thirst. Finding no water, Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren remained on hands and knees in exasperation. Suddenly they looked at one another curiously. There was movement in the ground they knelt on. Coming Snake stretched flat and pressed his ear to the ground. The meaning of the rumbling, shaking earth was unmistakable. Coming Snake sprang to his feet and ran to the top of a rise followed by Little Weasel and Sparring Wren. >From horizon to horizon, as far as they could see, was a thundering herd of bison now advancing on Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren. A moment later the buffalo had trampled Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren into oblivion.

Now there are those who believe that the Bison are no more and while it's true that perhaps as many as thirty million of these magnificent creatures were slaughtered by the greediest and vilest of the descendents of the Europeans, the herd survived and has been replenished.

Dear reader, you no doubt know that this story is meant to be allegorical, but what is the symbolism you may ask. Coming Snake and Little Weasel represent lawyers and judges with Sparring Wren being the administrative procedures of our so-called government. Other allusions incorporate the American Revolution, the founding fathers, anon; I shall not labor further explanation. But what does the thundering herd represent? Void Judgments!

I estimate that there may be as many as fifty million void judgments on file in America's courthouses. Judgments are void and subject to vacation if the record shows fraud, a jurisdictional failing, or inconsistency with due process. Generally, there is no statue of limitations on vacating void judgments!

What I'm telling you, my friend, and I'm not bothered if some say I'm evangelical in my approach, is that you or someone you know probably lost property or liberty as the result of a sham proceeding which can be vacated.

My sincerest apology to anyone who may be named, Coming Snake, Little Weasel, and Sparring Wren,

Richard Luke Cornforth

Posted 2:21 AM by Creditwrench

Unpublished Opinions: Inedible Sausage or Crazy Uncle?
Legal Times

At a Tuesday hearing in Washington, D.C., testimony will reveal a judiciary that is up in arms over an obscure proposal that would forbid all appeals courts from placing restrictions on the citation of so-called unpublished opinions. The unpolished language and sheer volume of unpublished opinions will create "a veritable amusement park for lawyers fond of playing games," says 9th Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski, the leading opponent of the rule.

Unpublished opinions

Posted 5:44 AM by Creditwrench

A new Richard Cornforth Seminar

Richard Cornforth will be holding a new seminar in San Diego, California

April 24th, 2004 and Sunday, April 25th, 2004
9 A.M to 5 P.M.

Four Points Sheraton Hotel
8110 Aero Drive
San Diego, CA 92123
(858(277-8888

This is the first Richard Cornforth seminar for 2004

Announced price is $200 per person or $300 per couple. This includes all course materials and lunch each day.

Richard Cornforth Seminar

in San Diego, California

Watch for the latest updates here and on the J-accuse National Headquarters blog

Richard Cornforth

Click the map for a blow up of the location

Richard Cornforth Article

ADVERTISING BY MAGNA CARTA NEWS

Air Force One remodeled ALA George Bush

CLICK HERE FOR THE CREDITWRENCH WEBSITE

Posted 8:10 AM by Creditwrench

CIVIL RIGHTS CONFERENCE
Through House Concurrent Resolution 1048 the Representatives congratulated the League of United Latin American Citizens for scheduling a conference entitled "Status and Future of Minorities' Civil Rights in Oklahoma."

The goal of the conference is "to engage the public and private sectors and community leaders in creating awareness and learning opportunities about civil rights," the resolution explains. To accomplish that goal the league "hopes to create a dynamic forum of information exchange to address the many important and complex issues
associated with civil rights across the state."

The conference is scheduled March 6 at Oklahoma City Community College.

Posted 11:13 AM by Creditwrench

The Citizens' Debate Commission is a nonpartisan organization that was established to sponsor future presidential debates. The Citizens' Debate Commission consists of national civic leaders from the left, center and right of the political spectrum who are committed to maximizing voter education. The Citizens' Debate Commission has an Advisory Board comprised of over fifty civic organizations that broadly reflect the composition and concerns of the electorate.

The nonpartisan Citizens' Debate Commission was formed because the bipartisan Commission on Presidential Debates, which has sponsored presidential debates during the past four election cycles, fails to adequately serve voters' interests. The Commission on Presidential Debates, which was created by the Republican and Democratic parties, secretly awards control of the presidential debates to the Republican and Democratic candidates, limiting voter choice and restricting subject matters of political discourse. Through the Commission on Presidential Debates, the Republican and Democratic candidates eliminate revealing debate formats, exclude popular third-party candidates, and avoid many pressing national issues. The result is diminished voter education and comfortable silence on critical issues of bipartisan agreement. The major party candidates never pay a political price for their antidemocratic practices because the Commission on Presidential Debates shields them from public criticism. For more information about the shortcomings of the Commission on Presidential Debates, please visit Open Debates.

Posted 4:38 AM by Creditwrench

I have found a very interesting article written by an attorney dealing with tort claims used by non custodial parents to regain their visitation rights when denied by custodial parents.

It is at Tort Action for visitation rights

Posted 10:51 AM by Creditwrench

By PAUL ENGLISH AND BARBARA HOBEROCK World Capitol Bureau
2/3/2004

Other key issues stressed in State of State speech

OKLAHOMA CITY -- Urging lawmakers to "resist the stale ideas and stagnant thinking of the past," Gov. Brad Henry on Monday endorsed ideas ranging from electronic gaming machines at racetracks to sweeping tort reform.

"Let us commit ourselves to excellence for an Oklahoma of now and tomorrow," Henry said in a 45-minute State of the State message to the Legislature.

"Education, health care, tax relief and economic development, these are the key issues we must face this year."

Henry said Oklahomans "deserve meaningful and genuine tort reform, and we will provide it."

"We will incorporate the best provisions of tort reforms recently enacted by our neighbor to the south, but we will not limit ourselves to a carbon copy of the Texas plan," he said.

"Once again, we will beat Texas."

Henry said Oklahoma needs to eliminate frivolous lawsuits and enact more reforms to protect doctors and health providers from unreasonable increases in malpractice premiums.

He urged lawmakers who might be "tempted to politicize" the issue to "resist that temptation.

"Oklahomans deserve better," he said.

The horse industry provides 50,000 jobs and has an economic impact of more than $1 billion, but the industry is in serious jeopardy, he said.

"We must provide parity and allow our racetracks to have electronic gaming machines -- just like those in the 82 tribal casinos throughout our state," Henry said.

Education funding: Speaking of education, he said the average teacher's salary in Oklahoma is nearly $4,000 less than the regional average.

"We must provide professional salaries and encourage professional development," Henry said. "We place great responsibility on the shoulders of our educators and it is time we act with equal responsibility."

He proposed a five-year plan to raise the average teacher salary in Oklahoma above the regional average.

He called for a summer program to enhance teacher development in math that would give graduates a $1,000 stipend.

More early childhood education is needed in Oklahoma, he said.

"The prekindergarten program in Tulsa, alone, was recognized by a recent Georgetown University study as the premier model to the nation," he said.

"It's time to build upon that success. I propose a $2 million appropriation for the Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness to expand its program to rural Oklahoma," Henry said.

The governor also proposed full funding for the Oklahoma Higher Learning Access Program which ensures college scholarships for eligible students.

He said his proposed budget also provides funding to eliminate the "sizable backlog of endowed chairs."

Oklahoma's CareerTech system is world-renowned but it is "time to flood the financial affairs of CareerTech with the same sunlight that helps ensure accountability for all state agencies," he said.

"Proper scrutiny is the prescription for healthy government."

Cigarette taxes: Henry said his proposal to raise the cigarette tax by 52 cents a pack would produce $130 million to fund vital health programs and reduce the number of teenagers who smoke.

"Under my budget, $100 million of the cigarette fee revenues will leverage three times that in federal dollars," he said.

"That, in turn will make health insurance available for as many as 200,000 currently uninsured Oklahomans."

He said Oklahoma is the only state where Medicaid does not provide screenings for breast cancer or cervical cancer, but his budget would provide Medicaid funding for the screening and treatment.

Prisons: The state is shackled by its dependence on prisons and must build upon options such as drug courts, mental health courts and community sentencing for nonviolent offenders, he said.

"Lock up the violent and dangerous, but find alternative ways to punish and correct the rest," Henry said.

Response: Republican legislative leaders said they were disappointed Henry didn't discuss workers compensation reform or same-sex marriages during his speech.

Rep. Todd Hiett, R-Kellyville, House Minority Floor Leader, said workers compensation reform is an issue which has held Oklahoma back for years.

Sen. James Williamson, R-Tulsa, said Henry should have used the speech as an opportunity to address the gay marriage issue.

Hiett was also critical of Henry's gaming plan, saying it will not bring parity to the ailing horse racing industry.

"It simply allows the horseracing tracks in Oklahoma to enact limited gaming, at limited times, on limited games, the Class II games," Hiett said. "At the same time, it would enable tribes in Oklahoma to participate in full fledged Class III casino style gaming."

House Speaker Larry Adair, D-Stilwell, said the Legislature can fund Henry's proposal for health insurance for educators with existing revenue.

But some other Henry proposals will require additional revenues.

"I don't think we need to kid Oklahoma citizens," Adair said. "I don't think we need to mislead them and give them some false hope that we can do these things without revenues. We are now down to the point it is show time."

Adair said Speaker-designate Jari Askins, D-Duncan, will champion workers compensation reform in the House.

Senate President Pro Tem Cal Hobson, D-Lexington, called the speech the "most upbeat positive, uplifting and challenging message" from any governor in his 26 years in the Legislature.

He said he preferred raising the tobacco tax by $1, not the 52-cent proposal from Henry. The steeper increase would discourage more children from smoking, he said.

"But to get things done out here -- it is the art of the possible, not the pathway to my way or the highway . . . it is a good start," Hobson said.

Henry endorses tort reform

Posted 6:22 AM by Creditwrench

You can keep up with what the Oklahoma legislature is doing by going to Daily Legislative News

Reports come in directly from the House and Senate.

Posted 6:43 AM by Creditwrench

A important new level of publication ability and technology has arrived for our J-accuse blog. It is named "Atom" and it means a whole new era of ease and portability for our blog.

It also heralds the advancement of search engine technology coming in the near future for Google since they own blogger. I've probably spoken before about API feeds which
Google rolled out a few months ago but so far hasn't been used much.

The whole thing boils down a discussion about what will become a new way of browsing which will help to cut down on virus problems and also mean that our blogs will get much wider media attention and much faster search engine placement for sites with relevant and meaningful content such as our J-accuse blog always has.

The first concept that needs to be propagated to and understood as well as accepted by the surfing public is that of feed readers. There are already a huge number of fairly good free feed readers and a few that you have to pay for. They are also known as "aggregators" and if you put that term in any of the search engines you will come up with a pretty good list of them. So far, they are pretty crude and have almost none of the bells and whistles that current browsers have but that will change over time as well.

But it makes little difference that feed readers are available if there is no way to syndicate and distribute one's blog without the hassle of hand coding the RSS feeds that are needed to generate the feeds and worse yet if the blog is not set up to make hand coding an efficient and feasable task.

Atom is the new process of handling those problems and will pretty well make feeding the aggregators an automated process. Once the majority of webmasters become aware of the new Atom technology they can easily set their blogs up to publish their blogs and get them into all the blogging search engines.

So now we have a reasonably viable set of tools to work with starting with multiple types of search engines such as GEO URLs which mean that the webmaster uses a GPs receiver or other means to determine his exact physical location in terms of decimal eqivalents for his latitude and longitude and puts that information in his blog or webpage coding and the GEO search engines will tell the world exactly where he is located. That may seem like utter foolishness to some at this time but it starts to make a lot of sense to those who think in terms of how easy that will make it to find driving directions to any business or home address anywhere on earth. And that don't help an awful lot until you have your vehicle equipped the way my pickup is equipped, meaning that it has a compass, a GPS receiver which feeds constant moving data to a laptop and a cell phone such as a Motorola V300 which has the capability to become an actual modem. So for about $20 a month you can now have internet in your car or truck with no problem and stay connected even when on the road and have a live feed right into your laptop so you can plot your course to any place on the face of the earth and and take the shortest and fastest route there. My pickup has quite a lot more features in it as well. There are 2 more computers in the bed of the truck and all 3 are fully controlable from the cab. And there is a dash mounted webcam as well with snapshot capability and of course the cell phone has a camera as well.

But I digress. So we have GEO URL search engines as well as the normal ones we are all familiar with and we also have search engines specifically for blogs plus the ones we are all familiar with and these are all being supported by Google at the present time. And we have Google API feeds which are helping to get blogs into the search engines much faster.

And now we have Atom which will make getting the blogs published much easier and more practical by eliminating the need for hand coding each article we write into RSS format for publication. Now it is all going to happen automatically and in real time.

That is a huge advancement thanks to Google and blogspot.com.

And I can tell you right now that there are a lot more advancements yet to come and are either already here or well on the way.

Posted 6:35 PM by Creditwrench

US-CERT
US-CERT, a partnership between the Department of Homeland Security's National Cyber Security Division (NCSD) and the private sector, has been established to protect our Nation's Internet infrastructure. It will do this through global coordination of defense against and response to cyber incidents and attacks across the United States.

US-CERT's objectives are to

* aggregate available cyber security information
* provide it to individuals and organizations in a timely and understandable manner.


Introducing the National Cyber Alert System

US-CERT also provides a mechanism that allows citizens, businesses, and other institutions to communicate directly with the United States government regarding cyber security information. US-CERT has created the National Cyber Alert System, which is America's first cohesive national cyber security system for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing emerging vulnerabilities and threats. The system provides credible and timely information on cyber security issues for both technical and non-technical users.

Homeland security virus alerts

Posted 7:07 PM by Creditwrench

Dear Group,

Twenty five people or more people are putting together a large
group
to do a Federal level "Civil Rights Suit , to stop Legal Abuse"
(Class
Action or Joinder) . We presently have a well known PA attorney that
may be willing to help us. We already have a group of people who have
entered to be part of this.

We need your name, e-mail address, phone number, your address is
optional but this will be needed at the time of our first meeting .
We
hope to meet in February in central NJ at that time.

My request is that you pass the word to help get more people to join
this action. There are many other groups, relatives, friends and even
support groups with many men and women receiving abuse by the judges
and attorneys that churn cases and violate laws, just to releive you
of your assets so they can fill their pensions and off shore bank
accounts. We must make a stand to stop this fraud, extortion and
perjury. Remember we and our children are being destroyed because no
one is stopping the criminals that control and rape our lives. We are
tired of talk.

It's time to have OUR voices listened to. Unite and take a stand.

Brew (for Civil Rights group known as "CRLA"
Russ Brust


CitizenCOPS of America
With Pennsylvania's JAIL4judges
www.CitizenCOPS.org
Have teamed up to assist in EQUAL protection of all laws and to
assure
the rights owed to the people of the United States are protected with
our own form of punishment and sanctions, from the people for the
people. At this time we are accepting LINKS to sites with simular
toppings to keep people posted and aware of the problems within and
on
how to get help and support for their own struggles.

CitizenCOPS


Lambocar.Com
A member of CitizenCOPS of America
www.CitizenCOPS.org

This webmaster is no aware of which jail4judges the author of this message is speaking of.

Posted 3:28 PM by Creditwrench

A new political website has been located. This site carries the story and websites for all political candidates nationwide. This is a great opportunity to send the candidates for all offices in your state as well as nationally and ask them their stance on whatever issue that is important to you.

Naturally this would include judicial reform and Judicial Accountability Legislation. If we act in sufficient numbers to make the candidates answer questions about judicial reform it may very well become a popular plank in the platforms of a fairly large number of candidates.

The Rational Review

Posted 3:46 PM by Creditwrench

We are all aware of public perception and it's effects on both people and nations. This is the fruit of our efforts in Iraq and other parts of the world. It is high time that we who are the citizens of this United States of America start to actively impress upon our leaders that this nation cannot long survive when our neighbor nations have these kinds of opinions of us. While many today advocate getting out the shotgun and the rifle as the only remaining solution to the problems we face today, this author believes that we can show them our displeasure in more acceptable ways than that and with a whole lot less blood being shed in the process. Maybe it is time to forget about traditional politics and see what we can do to vote in a Libertarian or other type candidates. If enough people were to do that to even scare the current crop of politicians we might be able to convince them to take other courses of action than going around trying to conquer the world which is most likely an impossible task anyway. Whatever we do we need to tell them we are not happy with the current state of affairs no matter how we go about doing it.

Posting to Headlines Wire of Scoop
Column: STATE OF IT by Selwyn Manning
Date: Monday, 12 January 2004
Time: 11:37 am NZT



Accepting PreEmptive Defence Cost Of U.S. FTA Deal

Embracing Pre-Emptive Defence Philosophy Likely Cost of U.S.
Free Trade

By Selwyn Manning – Scoop Co-Editor

New Zealand's nuclear free policy is the first rung on long ladder
leaning toward securing a free trade deal with the United States.
Most certainly New Zealand will also be required to embrace the
international law breaking U.S. policy of ‘Pre-emptive Defence'.

Compliance with U.S. foreign policy will be assumed.

Should New Zealand pursue this course, the only consequence possible
will be insignificance and disgrace. With international justice
ideals cast aside, abandonment of the Clark-Government's hard
earned social justice brand, New Zealand's independent voice
on international affairs would be exhausted handing the United
States a siphon to sap the country's identity of unified moral
self-respect.

The meetings of the Republican Six this weekend in Auckland's
Sheraton Hotel with New Zealand Ministry of Trade representatives
was no more than a preliminary exchange of musts and what-ifs.
Assertions by Foreign Affairs Minister Phil Goff that New Zealand
is playing ‘its part' in U.S. global military operations is concerning.
Certainly, the United States trade boffins will have interpreted
Goff's statement as a beginning point in NZ/U.S. trade negotiations.

It will be this assertion that the six-man Republican team will
herald once back in Washington.

Pre-emptive defence is cited within the September 2002 National
Security Strategy document, implemented by George W. Bush, as
reason to militarily strike foreign nations that are believed
by the U.S. president to pose risks to United States global dominance.

The National Security Strategy is the blueprint that gave Bush
license and sway within the United States to abandon the required
United Nations authorisation of an invasion of Iraq. International
law was consequently broken as the United States president created
rogue-state precedence, invaded Iraq on falsified claims that
the oil-rich state contained and was prepared to use weapons
of mass destruction against the USA and/or its ‘friends'.

The National Security Strategy renders the UN Charter's article
51 as meaningless, forges the U.S.'s right to wage 'preventative
war' against another nation, a concept advanced by expressing
rhetorically ‘imminent danger' fears presented to mask the USA's
true motives - as was demonstrably clear during U.S. justifications
on invading Iraq. Iraq is a precedence setting operation, not
an end.

Beyond the grand strategy lies abandonment of universally accepted
rules of justice. The denial of human rights, including the absence
of charges, and rights to possess detail of accusations justifying
one's imprisonment erodes the fundamental principles of which
the so called free world once held sacrosanct.

Those held gagged, hooded, bound, beaten in a legal no-man's-land
as ‘enemy combatants' at Guantanamo prison camp has drawn scorn
from even the U.S. Justice Department's inspector general in
a report that the Bush Administration chose to ignore.

Even without citing history, the state of the U.S. union has
abandoned the ideals laid down by its founding fathers. The currently
litany of abuse is long, continues daily inside the United States,
Iraq, Afghanistan, on the Korean Peninsula and elsewhere.

For New Zealand to willingly oblige this rogue-superpower with
compliance at what must be its lowest point of moral standing
is simply shallow and unbecoming of a country such as ours, founded
in modern times on ideals of global peace, international justice,
and recourse for those who fall victims to tyranny. New Zealand's
nuclear free legislation is surely a more enduring national identity
than 15 men in black jerseys fumbling for a rugby ball. This
mantel is worth preserving.

Indeed it is time to counter U.S. demands of what New Zealand
must do to enter a free-trade-pact. New Zealand now has an opportunity
to cite what the U.S. must relinquish to become a nation worthy
of friendly-nation status.

Posted 4:27 PM by Creditwrench

Richard Cornforth of Oklahoma City, founder of J'accuse suggests that the following may be useful to Mr. Dick Simkanin in resolving his legal problems with the IRS.
The entire brief as originally written by Mr. Richard Cornforth is available at Simbrief1.ZIP


In The United States District Court For The
Northern District of Texas
Fort Worth Division

The United States of America,)
)
plaintiff, )
)
v. ) case number 4-03CV1438-A
)
Richard Michael Simkanin, )
D/b/a Arrow Custom Plastics,)
)
defendant. )

Defendant, Richard Michael Simkanin, moves this court under authority of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 12 (b)(1) – this court is wholly and totally lacking in subject matter jurisdiction invoking this court’s non-discretionary duty to dismiss this
instant action with prejudice as to other filings

Brief in support

1. The papers filed in this instant case by Ramona S. Notinger, allegedly representing The United States of America, are, collectively, a substantive and procedural nullity – patently frivolous.
2. The first jurisdictional failing appearing on the face of the record is Notinger’s allusions to various titles without so much as one authority establishing a nexus between the title and Richard Michael Simkanin, hereinafter, “Dick Simkanin.” This court is noticed and Notinger is informed: Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and may only exercise jurisdiction when specifically authorized to do so. A party seeking to invoke a federal court's jurisdiction bears the burden of establishing that such jurisdiction exists. See Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (U.S. 01/02/1856), Security Trust Company v. Black River National Bank (12/01/02) 187 U.S. 211, 47 L. Ed. 147, 23 S. Ct. 52, McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 (1936), Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization et al. (06/05/39) 307 U.S. 496, 59 S. Ct. 954, 83 L. Ed. 1423, United States v. New York Telephone co. (12/07/77) 434 U.S. 159, 98 S. Ct. 364, 54 L. Ed. 2d 376, Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization et al. (05/14/79) 441 U.S. 600, 99 S. Ct. 1905, 60 L. Ed. 2d 508, Cannon v. University of Chicago et al. (05/14/79) 441 U.S. 677, 99 S. Ct. 1946, 60 L. Ed. 2d 560, Patsy v. Board of Regents State of Florida (06/21/82) 457 U.S. 496, 102 S. Ct. 2557, 73 L. Ed. 2d 172, Merrill Lynch v. Curran et al.. (05/03/82) 456 U.S. 353, 102 S. Ct. 1825, 72 L. Ed. 2d 182, 50 U.S.L.W. 4457, Insurance Corporation of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites de Guinee(06/01/82) 456 U.S. 694, 102 S. Ct. 2099, 72 L. Ed. 2d 492, 50 U.S.L.W. 4553, Matt T. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (05/16/94) 128 L. Ed. 2d 391, 62 U.S.L.W. 4313, United States ex rel. Holmes v. Consumer Ins. Group, 279 F.3d 1245, 1249 (10th Cir. 2002) citing United States ex rel. Precision Co. v. Koch Industries, 971 F.2d 548, 551 (10th Cir. 1992). Notinger’s papers cite not so much as one single authority empowering this court to act against Dick Simkanin relative to any of the federal titles Notinger impositions this court with.
3. Even if Notinger amended the defective complaint by citing a controlling authority wherein this court could have power of judicial review over individuals similarly situated to Dick Simkanin relative to the titles Notinger impositions this court with, Notinger’s papers are fundamentally lacking in evidentiary support that the Federal District court has territorial jurisdiction. Presumably, Notinger contents that the alleged infractions took place at 3717 Commerce Place, Suite A, Bedford, Texas 76021. This court has knowledge: jurisdiction can never be presumed. It is incumbent on the party asserting that the court has jurisdiction to prove that jurisdiction exists ON THE RECORD, to wit: Dick Simkanin challenges the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas’ territorial jurisdiction over 3717 Commerce Place, Suite A. Bedford, Texas 76021. Notice to the court: fifteen days from the service of this motion on Notinger, Notinger’s failure to prove that the federal district court for the Northern District of Texas has territorial jurisdiction over 3717 Commerce Place, Suite A. Bedford, Texas 76021 requires mandatory dismissal with prejudice. Submitted: Challenging territorial jurisdiction IS NOT A QUESTION FOR THE COURT. Proving jurisdiction is not a matter of Notinger’s opinions or conclusions.
4. Even if Notinger managed to produce the documentation showing that this court had jurisdiction, Notinger’s frauds on this court deprive this court of subject matter jurisdiction. Notinger’s frauds include: On page 2, article 6 of the so-called complaint for permanent injunction Notinger advances the fraud that the mere indictment of Dick Simkanin validates Mr. Sinkanin’s lawful obligation to comply with the federal titles Notinger impositions this court with. On page 4, article 30, Notinger claims that the IRS can prepare returns: Notinger’s arguments are fraudulent in context without Notinger proving to this court that the IRS has authority prepare substitute “1040’s.” On page 5, article 31, Notinger makes the absolutely absurd assertion that people can be compelled to obey the law. This patently frivolous, utterly nonsensical utterance of Notinger’s warrants the termination of Notinger’s employment for grotesque incompetence. Submitted: if people could be compelled to obey the law, the courts would all be empty. Perhaps Notinger could hire out as a consultant to various departments of public safety and inform them of their state’s prerogative to eliminate such organs as traffic courts and highway patrols by simply compelling people to obey traffic laws: this court absolutely knows that authority to compel compliance with any law as opposed to consequences for violation of law is not merely beyond the authority of this court, but is utterly absurd. On page 6, in article E. Notinger works a fraud on this court that this court has authority to compel a person to testify against themselves; On page 1, paragraph two of Notinger’s so-called “United States’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction,” Notinger works a fraud on this court by claiming that sums withheld from employees are “employment taxes.” Notinger should be compelled to appear and testify before a federal grand jury and explain her theory of how people can be assessed a tax for the privilege of working. Perhaps Notinger means federal income tax withholding. This court is noticed: such a characterization would be just another fraud by Notinger. Sums withheld from employees are not taxes but mere deposits as if held in escrow should the person for whom the withholding is done become subject to a tax. To reiterate: Notinger works a fraud on this court by urging that The United States Treasury has an lawful interest in sums withheld by an employer from employees. The mere act of withholding does establish that sums withheld are the United States’. Notinger’s claim that an employer who declines to participate in violation of 26 USC 7214(a) is depriving the United States Treasury is a fraud FRAUD! To re-reiterate: SUMS WITHHELD FROM EMPLOYEES ARE NOT TAXES PAID TO THE TREASURY AND SINCE THEY ARE NOT TAXES PAID TO THE TREASURY, FAILING TO WITHHOLD SUMS FROM EMPLOYEES CANNOT BE CONTRUED AS DEPRIVING THE TREASURY AS THE TREASURY HAS NO LAWFUL CLAIM TO SUMS WITHHELD BY VIRTUE OF THE FACT THAT SUMS ARE WITHHELD. See Baral v. United States, 528 U.S. 431, 120 S. Ct. 1006, 145 L. Ed. 2d 949 (U.S. 02/22/2000). Notinger also works a fraud on this court by impositioning this court to accept Joe Wayne Cooper as an uncertified expert witness. Cooper’s largely incoherent “declaration” is infested with cooper’s theories, conclusions, and opinions, which, while Notinger obviously thinks Cooper’s inflated sense of self-importance is instructional and informative to this court, this court has knowledge that the declaration is defective for reason that Cooper doesn’t state “the facts, just the facts,” but abuses this court to personally ridicule Dick Simkanin.
5. Even if Notinger amended the papers Notinger has impositioned this court with by cleansing the papers of the numerous frauds and other arrogated nonsense, Notinger’s complaint would still be barred by the Clean Hands Doctrine. The IRS, by and through countless agents including Notinger, Cooper, and also countless rogue agents such as federal judges, has unclean hands. This court is noticed of malum in se offenses occurring at 26 USC 7214(a). Unlawful acts of revenue officers or agents - Any officer or employee of the United States acting in connection with any revenue law of the United States - (1) who is guilty of any extortion or willful oppression under color of law; or (2) who knowingly demands other or greater sums than are authorized by law, or receives any fee, compensation, or reward, except as by law prescribed, for the performance of any duty; or (3) who with intent to defeat the application of any provision of this title fails to perform any of the duties of his office or employment; or(4) who conspires or colludes with any other person to defraud the United States; or (5) who knowingly makes opportunity for any person to defraud the United States; or (6) who does or omits to do any act with intent to enable any other person to defraud the United States; or (7) who makes or signs any fraudulent entry in any book, or makes or signs any fraudulent certificate, return, or statement; or (8) who, having knowledge or information of the violation of any revenue law by any person, or of fraud committed by any person against the United States under any revenue law, fails to report, in writing, such knowledge or information to the Secretary; or (9) who demands, or accepts, or attempts to collect, directly or indirectly as payment or gift, or otherwise, any sum of money or other thing of value for the compromise, adjustment, or settlement of any charge or complaint for any violation or alleged violation of law, except as expressly authorized by law so to do; shall be dismissed from office or discharged from employment and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both. The court may in its discretion award out of the fine so imposed an amount, not in excess of one-half thereof, for the use of the informer, if any, who shall be ascertained by the judgment of the court. The court also shall render judgment against the said officer or employee for the amount of damages sustained in favor of the party injured, to be collected by execution. This court has knowledge or means to know that IRS employees are paid bonuses for eviscerating folks such as Dick Simkanin – what law is that? Its also true that IRS agents, agents of the so-called Department of Justice, and rogue agents such as federal judges have demanded sums greater than and different from actually owed countless times, yet these agents and rogue agents go unpunished for their felony crimes articulated under 26 USC 7214(a) and collaterally occurring at 18 USC 1961 & 1962 soiling the hands of the United States prohibiting the United States from lawfully prosecuting any action prior to ferreting out and prosecuting every single criminal employed by in service of the IRS, whether an actual employee or a rogue such as a federal judge, and punishing them to the full extent of the law. How can this court know that 26 USC 7214(a) has been violated countless times? It’s simple really; the IRS failed audit, see - GAO/T-AIMD-96-56 which revealed that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE could not verify that IRS agents including directors and rogue agents such as judges, HAD EVER COMPLIED WITH 26 USC 7214(a). No GAO audit of the IRS since the failed audit verifies that the IRS has “cleaned up their act.”
6. Even if the IRS cleaned up its act by doing the inconceivable of prosecuting and sending to prison, tens of thousands of IRS agents, so-called justice department attorneys, and rogue agents such as federal judges, the United States would still have unclean hands by virtue of the fact that the IRS achieves court results by threatening, coercing, and intimidating federal judges. It has become common knowledge that the IRS maintains a file on all federal judges with the threat that should that federal judge get out of line by ruling according to the law of the land instead of the private agenda of the IRS and the unseen power, the criminal element which the IRS so effectively serves, that federal judge shall suffer consequences so severe that no person interested in self-preservation would even consider crossing the IRS and the so-called Department of Justice. Evidence and testimony available on request.
Conclusion
7. This court has a non-discretionary duty to dismiss civil action 4-03CV1438 for the Northern District of Texas with prejudice as to other filings.


Prepared and submitted by: _________________________________
Richard Michael Simkanin

Certificate of service

I, ________________________, certify that _________________________, I hand delivered a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing defendant’s motion to dismiss to: Ramona S. Notinger, 717 N. Harwood, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas 75201


_______________________________

---

Mr. Cornforth also suggests the following for consideration by Dick Simkanin

In The United States District Court For The
Northern District of Texas
Fort Worth Division

The United States of America, )
)
plaintiff, )
)
v. ) case number 4-03CV1438-A
)
Richard Michael Simkanin, )
D/b/a Arrow Custom Plastics, )
)
defendant. )

Defendant, Richard Michael Simkanin, moves this court under authority of 28 USC 144 and the Code of Conduct for United States Judges for disqualification of (judge’s name)

Brief in support

This court is noticed of this court’s non-discretionary duty to recuse: 28 USC 144 is a “shall” statute, and the Code of Conduct for United States Judges requires a judge’s disqualification where the judge has a vested financial interest in the outcome of the litigation, no matter how slight.
(judge’s name) is on the payroll of the plaintiff in this lawsuit and therefore has a vested financial interest in the outcome of the litigation. The Code of Conduct for United States Judges precludes (judge’s name) or any other judge similarly situated from hearing this case.










Affidavit
I, Richard Michael Simkanin, of age and competent to testify state as follows based on my own personal knowledge:
I will not receive a fair trial in (judge’s name)’ court.

___________________________
Richard Michael Simkanin

STATE OF TEXAS INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
COUNTY OF ______________________

Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State on this ____ day of ________, 2004, personally appeared __________________________ to me known to be the identical person who executed the within and foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same as his free and voluntary act.
Given under my hand and seal the day and year last above written.
My commission expires __________
________________ Notary Public

Conclusion
This court has a non-discretionary duty to dismiss civil action 4-03CV1438 for the Northern District of Texas with prejudice as to other filings.


Prepared and submitted by: _________________________________
Richard Michael Simkanin





Certificate of service

I, ________________________, certify that _________________________, I hand delivered a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing defendant’s motion to dismiss to: Ramona S. Notinger, 717 N. Harwood, Suite 400, Dallas, Texas 75201


_______________________________

Posted 7:38 AM by Creditwrench

Whether or not each of us personally agrees with the reasons set forth in this article is really unimportant. It is important that we are not alone in our perception and belief that the judiciary is rotten to the core and needs to be overhauled from the top down.

FIRST-PERSON: Judges need to be 'checked & balanced'
Friday, Nov 21, 2003
By Kelly Boggs

McMINNVILLE, Ore. (BP)--"O beautiful for patriot dream that sees beyond the years" the fourth stanza begins in the classic composition, "America the Beautiful." We in the United States are benefactors of the unique wisdom and uncanny foresight shown by the founders of our nation. They not only sacrificed to secure their own liberty; they also formed a government based on a timeless Constitution that would benefit future generations.

If America was to survive and thrive into the future, the founders understood all too well that the new nation would have to rest on a sturdy foundation of proven principles. Thus the U.S. Constitution was intended to withstand populist trends and societal fads.

The framers of the Constitution, and the subsequent Bill of Rights, carefully crafted a document that flowed from a Christian consensus. This is not to imply that all the founders were Christians. However, there was an overwhelming acceptance of a Creator who had established the world upon fixed laws -- the "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God," as referred to in the Declaration of Independence.

The very reality of a government with a separation of powers is due to the fact that our founders believed that man, as an inherently sinful creature, could not be trusted with unchecked power. With the establishment of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, the constitutional framers were in essence saying that they did not even trust themselves with concentrated power.

In recent years the founders have been much maligned for their flaws and shortcomings. One such criticism involves their failure to address the insidious institution of slavery. While some have sought to excuse them on the basis that they were merely products of their time, there really is no justification for their action or lack thereof. However, it should be noted that the Constitution they produced became the very vehicle for righting the wrong they had indulged.

The framers of the Constitution understood well that they were flawed and, as such, prone to mistakes. The result: They made provision in the Constitution whereby future generations could revise any legislative mistakes they or ensuing lawmakers might make.

In Article V of the Constitution, the founders set forth the manner in which their guiding document could be amended. One of the very first uses of the amendment process was to outlaw slavery in America; thus a glaring mistake of the framers was corrected by the Constitution they created.

The time has again come for the people of the United States to demand that the amendment process be utilized. And no, I am not talking about a "defense of marriage" addition to the Constitution. While such an amendment is perhaps needed, I believe it is time for a much broader amendment -- one that will provide the American people with a safety valve against the tyranny we now face.

For at least four decades the judiciary has been slowly spinning out of control. With the recent rulings concerning sodomy, the Ten Commandments and homosexual "marriage," it is now obvious that judges are accountable to no one and nothing, least of all the "Laws of Nature and Nature's God."

The rest of the story.